Real Women of Science
Nov. 7th, 2011 10:28 amNot that Marie Curie wasn't important, because she was, but she wouldn't have been Marie Curie if there weren't other women who came before her to pave the way. They may not be household names, but they are just as deserving of a Google Doodle for their birthdays.
Here is a quick list of 10 female scientists you should know. Compiled by the Smithsonian.
And to celebrate all these awesome women and their influences, I am going to go blow stuff up later with some Girl Scouts from District X. Because nothing beats blowing stuff up for the sake of science.
And as always, children, safety third.*
*Okay. I may have been watching too many episodes of Rocket City Rednecks to motivate my Physics homework. I blame their adorable Southern accents.
Here is a quick list of 10 female scientists you should know. Compiled by the Smithsonian.
And to celebrate all these awesome women and their influences, I am going to go blow stuff up later with some Girl Scouts from District X. Because nothing beats blowing stuff up for the sake of science.
And as always, children, safety third.*
*Okay. I may have been watching too many episodes of Rocket City Rednecks to motivate my Physics homework. I blame their adorable Southern accents.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 07:40 pm (UTC)And the best part is that they use stuff that they just found around. Like a moon buggy made from bicycle frames. And they are just almost every stereotype of a backwoods hillbilly, except they have like PhDs and above Top Secret Clearance.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 07:50 pm (UTC)Oh no. That experiment is too overdone. We will be blowing up film canisters, making fruit skin fireballs, and using the sun to start a fire (maybe, it might not be sunny enough). All for the good of education and stuff.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-07 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 12:42 am (UTC)Also, if safety is third, I'm curious as to what the first two adherences are meant to be.